[Previous] patio11's Passive People Example | Home | [Next] Discussion (late 2017)

The Four Best Books

The four best books are The Fabric of Reality and The Beginning of Infinity by David Detusch (DD), and Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand (AR).

Everyone should learn this stuff, but currently only a handful of people in the world know much about all four of these books. This material is life-changing because it deals with broad ideas which are important to most of life, and which challenge many things people currently think they know.

However: they’re way too deep and novel to read once and understand. The ideas are correct to a level of detailed precision that people don't even know is a possible thing to try for. The normal way people read books is inadequate to learn all the wonderful ideas in these books. To understand , there’s two options:

1) be an AR or DD yourself, be on their level or reasonably close, be the kind of person who could invent the ideas in the first place. then you could learn it alone (though it’d still involve many rereadings and piles of supplementary material, unless you were dramatically better than AR or DD.)

this is not intended as an option for people to choose, they're like one in a billion kind of people. and even if one could do it, it’s way harder than (2) so it'd be a dumb approach.

2) get help with error correction from other people who already understand the ideas. realistically, this requires a living tradition of people willing to help with individualized replies. it’s plenty hard enough to learn the ideas even with great resources like that. to last, it has to educate new people faster than existing people stop participating or die. (realistically, this method still involves supplementary material, rereadings, etc, in addition to discussion.)

What is the current situation regarding relevant living traditions?

DD

for the DD stuff, there’s only one living tradition available: the Fallible Ideas community.

the most important parts of the DD material is based on Karl Popper's philosophy, Critical Rationalism (CR). there’s some CR-only stuff elsewhere, but the quality is inadequate.

Fallible Ideas

besides reading the books, it's also important to understand how the DD and AR ideas fit together, and how to apply the cohesive whole to life.

there's lots of written material about this on my websites and in discussion archives. the only available living tradition for this is the Fallible Ideas community.

AR

for the AR stuff, there are two living traditions available which i consider valuable. there are also others like Branden fans, Kelley fans, various unserious fan forums, etc, which i don’t think are much help.

the two valuable Rand living traditions disagree considerably on some topics, but they do also agree a ton on other topics.

they are the Fallible Ideas community and the Peikoff/Ayn Rand Institute/Binswanger community. The Peikoff version of Objectivism doesn’t understand CR; it’s inductivist. There are other significant flaws with it, but there’s also a lot of value there. It’s has really helpful elaborations of what Rand meant on many topics.


Elliot Temple on September 14, 2017

Comments (9)

> The Four Best Books

The four best books for people who value the same things as Elliot?

People value different things. There are also some people don't know what to value yet.


FF at 9:19 AM on September 20, 2017 | #9049 | reply | quote

objectively.

if you doubt it, your comments should include naming some other book and giving some criticism of one of these four.

some people disagree isn't a criticism, it's a popularity contest.


Anonymous at 9:21 AM on September 20, 2017 | #9050 | reply | quote

> some people disagree isn't a criticism, it's a popularity contest.

I am second-handed :(


FF at 5:23 AM on September 21, 2017 | #9060 | reply | quote

#9060

How does being sad about being second handed help you?


Anonymous at 10:28 AM on September 22, 2017 | #9070 | reply | quote

Would Szasz (The MOMI) book be the 5th best book?


FF at 5:52 AM on September 24, 2017 | #9071 | reply | quote

no. Virtue of Selfishness, Human Action, Capitalism, Conjectures and Refutations, Political Justice, etc


Anonymous at 10:30 AM on September 24, 2017 | #9072 | reply | quote

> for the DD stuff, there’s only one living tradition available

1. On the internet, there is a large Twitter community (which is much friendlier and diverse than the Fallible Ideas community) -- https://twitter.com/daviddeutschoxf

2. There is a non-internet world with living traditions -- people are discussing David Deutsch's ideas in a number of places: academia, personal interactions, book clubs, classes, the physics community, etc.


Anonymous at 12:27 AM on August 18, 2019 | #13322 | reply | quote

>> for the DD stuff, there’s only one living tradition available

> 1. On the internet, there is a large Twitter community (which is much friendlier and diverse than the Fallible Ideas community) -- https://twitter.com/daviddeutschoxf

The DD twitter fan club people are not friendlier than FI (they block ppl, are hostile to or disinterested in crit), nor are they a living tradition for seriously learning DD stuff.

You can get some indication of the quality by reading the LT Analyzing Lies material or the ET/Alan/Justin crits of Hermes of Reason

Also not sure wtf the relevance of some unspecified diversity is to learning hard DD stuff (presuming you meant to say "more diverse" btw)

> 2. There is a non-internet world with living traditions -- people are discussing David Deutsch's ideas in a number of places: academia, personal interactions, book clubs, classes, the physics community, etc.

Other than perhaps physics community, how many of these discussions lead to serious learning?


Anonymous at 7:21 AM on August 18, 2019 | #13323 | reply | quote

#13322 Can you link to a representative, productive, impressive discussion by that community?


Anonymous at 7:43 PM on August 18, 2019 | #13325 | reply | quote

(This is an unmoderated discussion forum. Discussion info.)